If the sequence of children is associated with an inventiveness that seems it was a myth. Imagine how it feels to say stupid, just because we birth in the final sequence of our other brothers.
There is a belief that is embedded in the minds of some people that the IQ of children associated with birth order. In other words, it feels the younger child should be sad because you're the last sequence of the ability of a stupid nickname.
But whoa, you do not sit thoughtfully think you are unhappy fate. A recent study showed the totally wrong perception that more and more of their young (birth order most recent), children will be more stupid.
Apparently, number two of the children is not always more intelligent than the number of children aged three and intelligence are not affected by the number of family members or a child in the birth of the family, rather than factors such as genetic inheritance, IQ, number of steps at home and at school as most important in determining children's intelligence, researchers say.
"In fact, a family is likely to spread to as many sources of intelligence of all the children they have," said study author Joseph Lee Rodgers, a psychologist at the University of Oklahoma.
Both the number of children in the family or order the birth of a child in a family can not predict the score of a child's IQ. Their findings appear in the journal American Psychologist, published
American Psychological Association.
Rodgers and colleagues from other universities to analyze data from intelligence tests given to 2,500 children aged 5-15 years, about 1,300 families. Information collected National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, an ongoing study funded by the government and provide information to investigators about the different types of subjects of the family.
The key to their discovery is the method called analysis of "family" and family members are compared with each other. Most other studies on this topic, said Rodgers, used the analysis of cross-family, comparing a child in a family with children
Another of the family. However, this method produces results
abuse, the researchers say this.
For example, he said, the second son of a family can be more intelligent than the third child of another family, which led to the conclusion that birth order affects children's level of intelligence seprang.
But comparing children in a family noted that birth order and intelligence of children do not have a relationship, if the family has nothing to do with intelligence.
Gragman Jordan, chief of cognitive neuroscience at the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and irregularities, said the new discovery is "very sensitive". Every time someone has reported the discovery of evolution, said Gragman you're looking for biological reasons to explain this.
But, he said, the previous assumption that intelligence is reduced to every child the following sequence seems contrary to reason people have a large family, which is to help maintain the viability and size of any family has often been used in the past, Rodgers said, because researchers can collect data much more easily than information on the family.
"It's very difficult to obtain data reflecting the situation in the family, compare the first son of his second child in same family," he said.
You can imagine how difficult it is, "says Rodgers, and not just ask a family member during the two hours of the time, but then wonder if the whole family could be interviewed to provide such a long time and if everyone should be tested every two years, largely.
There is a belief that is embedded in the minds of some people that the IQ of children associated with birth order. In other words, it feels the younger child should be sad because you're the last sequence of the ability of a stupid nickname.
But whoa, you do not sit thoughtfully think you are unhappy fate. A recent study showed the totally wrong perception that more and more of their young (birth order most recent), children will be more stupid.
Apparently, number two of the children is not always more intelligent than the number of children aged three and intelligence are not affected by the number of family members or a child in the birth of the family, rather than factors such as genetic inheritance, IQ, number of steps at home and at school as most important in determining children's intelligence, researchers say.
"In fact, a family is likely to spread to as many sources of intelligence of all the children they have," said study author Joseph Lee Rodgers, a psychologist at the University of Oklahoma.
Both the number of children in the family or order the birth of a child in a family can not predict the score of a child's IQ. Their findings appear in the journal American Psychologist, published
American Psychological Association.
Rodgers and colleagues from other universities to analyze data from intelligence tests given to 2,500 children aged 5-15 years, about 1,300 families. Information collected National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, an ongoing study funded by the government and provide information to investigators about the different types of subjects of the family.
The key to their discovery is the method called analysis of "family" and family members are compared with each other. Most other studies on this topic, said Rodgers, used the analysis of cross-family, comparing a child in a family with children
Another of the family. However, this method produces results
abuse, the researchers say this.
For example, he said, the second son of a family can be more intelligent than the third child of another family, which led to the conclusion that birth order affects children's level of intelligence seprang.
But comparing children in a family noted that birth order and intelligence of children do not have a relationship, if the family has nothing to do with intelligence.
Gragman Jordan, chief of cognitive neuroscience at the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and irregularities, said the new discovery is "very sensitive". Every time someone has reported the discovery of evolution, said Gragman you're looking for biological reasons to explain this.
But, he said, the previous assumption that intelligence is reduced to every child the following sequence seems contrary to reason people have a large family, which is to help maintain the viability and size of any family has often been used in the past, Rodgers said, because researchers can collect data much more easily than information on the family.
"It's very difficult to obtain data reflecting the situation in the family, compare the first son of his second child in same family," he said.
You can imagine how difficult it is, "says Rodgers, and not just ask a family member during the two hours of the time, but then wonder if the whole family could be interviewed to provide such a long time and if everyone should be tested every two years, largely.
0 comments:
Post a Comment